[vorbis-dev] mingw compiling problem for libogg

[Dan Miller]

general question --
 
is there any consensus on ming vs. cygwin?  I'm used to cygwin but would switch if it made sense.  There are some definite wierdnesses with autoconf and make under cygwin.

        -----Original Message----- 
        From: rillian [mailto:rillian at telus.net] 
        Sent: Thu 12/12/2002 7:19 AM 
        To: vorbis-dev at xiph.org 
        Cc: 
        Subject: Re: [vorbis-dev] mingw compiling problem for libogg
        
        

        Hmm. If we can use a modern autoconf, we can just make this '#ifdef
        HAVE_STDINT' and make it the default.
        
          -r
        
        On Tuesday, December 10, 2002, at 11:09  pm, Nehal Mistry wrote:
        
	> --- os_types.h.old    Fri Jul 19 02:25:52 2002
	> +++ os_types.h        Tue Dec 10 15:07:10 2002
	> @@ -32,6 +32,13 @@
	>     typedef __int32 ogg_int32_t;
	>     typedef unsigned __int32 ogg_uint32_t;
	>     typedef __int16 ogg_int16_t;
	> +#  elif defined(__MINGW32__)
	> +   /* Mingw */
	> +#  include <stdint.h>
	> +   typedef int64_t ogg_int64_t;
	> +   typedef int32_t ogg_int32_t;
	> +   typedef uint32_t ogg_uint32_t;
	> +   typedef int16_t ogg_int16_t;
	>  #  else
	>     /* Cygwin */
	>     #include <_G_config.h>
        
        --- >8 ----
        List archives:  http://www.xiph.org/archives/
        Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/
        To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-dev-request at xiph.org'
        containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body.  No subject is needed.
        Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.
        

.+-j·!Š÷¬†Ûiÿü0醊àýªÜ†+Þ:)®ˆÞrØh™êZèm¶ŸÿÃ1Š˜h®èN‹§²æìr¸›yúèšØb²X¬¶Ç§u©ž²Æ zÚ/¢¶â±×¯­ê®zËqŠ˜hr‰íj)âž
'—+a{
+véì¹»®&ÞŠ{ayºÈÚ,¹¸ÞrجçR{.nÇ+‰·¦zˁë,z{m¢Ø^–+-Â)emè žŠÞw÷â–׫