[vorbis-dev] One codebook for all audiofiles?
Erik Stenborg
d99papa at dtek.chalmers.se
Tue May 29 11:27:25 PDT 2001
On Tue, 29 May 2001, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> I think that yours is a poor recommendation.
>
> MPEGplus is a dead end format in my opinion: I has no advantage over mp3
> from an intellectual property prospective. It's client base is miniscule,
> it's platform support is poor (no portable support at all). There have been
> no scientifically performed listening tests that I'm aware of.
I agree that mp+ has bad platformsupport. But i find the quality superior
to other formats, but... thats just my personal opinion. I've found
several clips where ogg and mp3 produce artifacts but none where mp+ does.
So its still my first choice.
Have you tried it?
Btw, what do you mean by "no advantage over mp3" ? That it isnt a
transformcoder?
>
> When talking about archival: The poster indicated he was willing to tolerate
> poor compression ratios of 4:1. I would recommend a lossless coder today
> such as FLAC, with later conversion to high bitrate Vorbis for a result with
> long term sustainability.
>
I agree, but then he cant reach 4:1 ratio. Most lossless compressors only
reaches 2:1.
cheers
/Erik
--- >8 ----
List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-dev-request at xiph.org'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed.
Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.
More information about the Vorbis-dev
mailing list