[vorbis-dev] BCB build successful?
David K. Gasaway
dgasaway at bigvalley.net
Wed Jan 31 19:05:41 PST 2001
> Well, I'm no expert but this is on the BladeEnc homepage:
> Old versions of BladeEnc were very sensitive for compiler
> optimisations. Even well known compilers as Visual C++ and GNU C
> generated mutated versions of BladeEnc, producing lower quality
> output, when optimisations were enabled.
> However, the cause of this problem has later been identified and
> solved (it was a compiler error, but it could easily and safely be
> avoided by marking a certain variable as 'volatile') and is no longer
> of any greater concern.
> So apparently it's solved now, and it was indeed a compiler bug.
Well, the way I read it, they've worked around the compiler bugs.
In other words, the compiler bugs could still be there, though
probably not in the case of gcc. It's possible vorbis would need
similar tweaks, but I'm quite sure Monty and team would have fixed
these sorts of things long ago on the compilers they use.
> Must be source differences then.
I'm not convinced of that, but it's my best guess.
David K. Gasaway
dgasaway at comports.com
Sound Blaster Pro - A professional way to blow your ears
Sig by Kookie Jar 5.98b http://go.to/generalfrenetics/
31 January 2001
--- >8 ----
List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-dev-request at xiph.org'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed.
Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.
More information about the Vorbis-dev