[vorbis-dev] comment field proposal
Daniel Phillips
phillips at bonn-fries.net
Sun May 14 04:56:50 PDT 2000
On Sun, 14 May 2000, you wrote:
> > What if the comment fields were defined to be HTML/XML? That way you
> > could put ordinary text in them - only "<" and a couple of other
> > characters would require special treatment.
>
> Woah... aren't we going a tad far for what was supposed to be a simple
> comment field?
>
> I may be mistaken on this, but I thought the comments field was just there
> to store absolutely essential "I need this immediately forget everything
> else" type information. Now there seems to be a great deal of talk about
> putting in an insane number of details...
Actually, it doesn't add any detail to the code, just to the documentation.
You wouldn't be required to use the feature.
> I thought the plan was to interleave an XML metadata stream with the
> vorbis stream to hold all the needless details that people seem to enjoy.
Well, it seems to me that if you are going to use unicode you have a duty to
identify the language. So either HTML/XML, as the route of least resistance,
should be allowed in the comment fields, or all this should be moved to the
metadata stream. Allowing such a thing is really no work and after all,
this is year 2000, we have the tools to display the stuff.
A compromise would be to expect nothing in the 0th field, so that people
putting data there wouldn't have to worry about special treatment of "<" etc.
--
Daniel
--- >8 ----
List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/
More information about the Vorbis-dev
mailing list