[Tremor] RE: Tremor Digest, Vol 10, Issue 1

[KumarBraj Bhushan]

Hey, I am also looking for this thesis.pdf. If anyone knows any better link..let me know too. Madhav, you can do buffering of output samples to smoothen framewise complexity requirements. 

-----Original Message-----
From: tremor-request at xiph.org [mailto:tremor-request at xiph.org]
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2005 1:30 AM
To: tremor at xiph.org
Subject: Tremor Digest, Vol 10, Issue 1


Send Tremor mailing list submissions to
	tremor at xiph.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/tremor
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	tremor-request at xiph.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
	tremor-owner at xiph.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Tremor digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Ogg/Vorbis report, FFT optimizations (Madhav)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 11:30:00 -0800
From: "Madhav" <madhav at mtekvision.com>
Subject: [tremor] Ogg/Vorbis report, FFT optimizations
To: <tremor at xiph.org>
Message-ID: <000601c51f5e$39b27230$350410ac at Madhav>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Hi all,

1. I need the thesis report for the http://www.sandvall.nu/thesis.pdf, Now this website do not contain this pdf. Can anyone mail me this pdf.

2. I have some questions regarding tremor. I am intended to use this for arm946e-s platform.
I made the profiling on ads 1.2 for arm946e-s processot of the tremor and found following statstics:

Name                            time%
XPROD31                        12.28%
---------------------------------------------------------------------
XNPROD31                       11.82%
----------------------------------------------------------------------
_vorbis_apply_window            8.39%
----------------------------------------------------------------------
mdct_butterfly_generic       7.36%
----------------------------------------------------------------------
mdct_backward                 7.34%
----------------------------------------------------------------------
vorbis_synthesis_blockin        6.30%
----------------------------------------------------------------------
ov_read                         6.16%
----------------------------------------------------------------------
floor1_inverse2                 5.64%
----------------------------------------------------------------------
vorbis_book_decodevv_add        4.68%
----------------------------------------------------------------------
mdct_butterfly_16             3.95%
----------------------------------------------------------------------
mdct_bitreverse               3.95%
----------------------------------------------------------------------
decode_packed_entry_number      3.91%
----------------------------------------------------------------------
XPROD32                        2.88%
----------------------------------------------------------------------
mapping0_inverse              2.73%
----------------------------------------------------------------------
mdct_butterflies              1.75%
----------------------------------------------------------------------
oggpack_look                    1.62%
----------------------------------------------------------------------
oggpack_adv                     1.44%
----------------------------------------------------------------------
mdct_butterfly_8              1.10%
----------------------------------------------------------------------
__rt_memcpy_w                   1.06%
----------------------------------------------------------------------
res2_inverse                    0.96%
----------------------------------------------------------------------
floor1_inverse1                 0.88%
----------------------------------------------------------------------
__rt_memclr_w                   0.75%

Here functions in bold is for the mdct, it is taking more than 50 % of the ogg-vorbis decode time.
How fft based method is used to optimise this further?

3. I am trying to compute the mips? The sizes supported by ogg are 256 or 2048

So i compute the mips as:

  MIPS (taken by ov_read) = [cycles taken by ov_read ( ) / sample] * sampling frequency * 10^-6

    Example: cycles taken by ov_read ( ) is say 20,00,000

  MIPS (taken by ov_read) = [cycles taken by ov_read ( ) / sample] * sampling frequency * 10^-6

 MIPS taken = (20,00,000 / 2048) * 44100 * 10^-6
                    = 43.06640625 MIPS


Is this interpretation correct?

I am waiting for the help from you all.

With Regards,

Madhav Kulkarni





 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/tremor/attachments/20050302/2563e105/attachment-0001.html

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Tremor mailing list
Tremor at xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/tremor


End of Tremor Digest, Vol 10, Issue 1
*************************************