[Speex-dev] [PATCH 2/3] Use fabsf() instead of fabs() since we have floats, not double
pmeerw at pmeerw.net
Tue Apr 15 14:36:45 PDT 2014
> > Seems fine, fabsf is supported everywhere fabs is?
> No. AFAIK, fabsf() is C99-only, which would be a problem.
right, fabsf() is C99, fabs() is C89 (according to fabs(3) man)
I wasn't aware of this constraint; it might be a good idea to enforce/test
C89 compliance with "gcc -std=c89" then
More information about the Speex-dev