[Speex-dev] [PATCH 2/3] Use fabsf() instead of fabs() since we have floats, not double

Jean-Marc Valin jmvalin at jmvalin.ca
Tue Apr 15 13:49:51 PDT 2014

Previous message: [Speex-dev] [PATCH 2/3] Use fabsf() instead of fabs() since we have floats, not double
Next message: [Speex-dev] [PATCH 2/3] Use fabsf() instead of fabs() since we have floats, not double
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 15/04/14 03:45 PM, Tristan Matthews wrote:
> Seems fine, fabsf is supported everywhere fabs is?

No. AFAIK, fabsf() is C99-only, which would be a problem.

	Jean-Marc

Previous message: [Speex-dev] [PATCH 2/3] Use fabsf() instead of fabs() since we have floats, not double
Next message: [Speex-dev] [PATCH 2/3] Use fabsf() instead of fabs() since we have floats, not double
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the Speex-dev mailing list