[Speex-dev] 回复: (no subject)
烂馍馍.
xialonghua at vip.qq.com
Mon Dec 5 20:56:27 PST 2011
yes, you are right.but its not one instance of codec.
------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------
发件人: "Jean-Marc Valin"<jmvalin at jmvalin.ca>;
发送时间: 2011年12月6日(星期二) 中午12:52
收件人: "speex-dev"<speex-dev at xiph.org>;
主题: Re: [Speex-dev] (no subject)
Actually, it *is* thread safe as long as you don't use the *same* state
at the same time from two calls. i.e. you can easily encode two
different streams from two different threads.
Jean-Marc
On 11-12-01 04:55 AM, 烂馍馍. wrote:
> it.s not safe.
>
>
> ------------------ Original ------------------
> *From: * "Денис Ромашенко"<romius99 at mail.ru>;
> *Date: * Thu, Dec 1, 2011 04:43 PM
> *To: * "speex-dev"<speex-dev at xiph.org>;
> *Subject: * [Speex-dev] (no subject)
>
> Hi.
> Is the speexlib thread safe?
>
> _______________________________________________
> Speex-dev mailing list
> Speex-dev at xiph.org
> http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/speex-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Speex-dev mailing list
> Speex-dev at xiph.org
> http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/speex-dev
_______________________________________________
Speex-dev mailing list
Speex-dev at xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/speex-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20111206/0c89210b/attachment.htm
More information about the Speex-dev
mailing list