[Speex-dev] ietf discussion about draft-ietf-avt-rtp-speex

Aymeric Moizard jack at atosc.org
Fri Feb 27 02:28:57 PST 2009

Tks ivo,

I missed this comment:

>Discuss [2009-02-25]:
>Although the MIME specification does not appear to forbid the same
>content type parameter from appearing twice (something that's unlikely
>to work in practice), it is explicit that order of parameters is not
>significant (meaning a processor is free to re-order them).
>RFC 2045, p 10 at the bottom:
>  "The ordering of parameters is not significant."
>That means it is not acceptable for a media type registration to impose
>an ordering restriction on content-type parameters as this one does.
>So if you want order to matter, you need to encode the mode values as
>a comma-separated or space-separated list.

I guess a comma separated list will be mandary here... Instead of the 
current way.

amsip - http://www.antisip.com
osip2 - http://www.osip.org
eXosip2 - http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/exosip/

On Fri, 27 Feb 2009, Ivo Emanuel Gonçalves wrote:

> Some (all?) of the comments seem to be available here,
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/idtracker/ballot/2837/
> -Ivo

More information about the Speex-dev mailing list