[Speex-dev] CELT 0.5.0 is out
jean-marc.valin at usherbrooke.ca
Tue Oct 14 03:57:51 PDT 2008
Diana Cionoiu a écrit :
> Hi Jean-Marc,
> 1. Why CELT versus Speex?
There's nearly no overlap between Speex and CELT. CELT is much higher
quality, very low latency, and of course, higher bit-rate than Speex. So
it really depends on the application.
> 2. What's the RTP payload for CELT, so we can add it in Yate?
> 3. What are the SDP declaration parameters?
None of that is defined yet, though I'm open to suggestions on how to do
> Jean-Marc Valin wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>> I'm happy to announce CELT version 0.5.0. This release includes
>> simplifications to the bit allocation code and includes a new
>> low-complexity mode that can be enabled (without breaking compatibility)
>> on the encoder side. There are several other optimisations and bug fixes
>> included. The API has also been slightly modified, so code using CELT
>> will have to be updated (only minor changes required).
>> You can download it from the website: http://www.celt-codec.org/
>> Please note that the bit-stream still isn't frozen which means that 1)
>> we can still improve things and 2) you can't rely on compatibility yet.
>> Speex-dev mailing list
>> Speex-dev at xiph.org
More information about the Speex-dev