jean-marc.valin at usherbrooke.ca
Fri Jun 1 06:34:14 PDT 2007
Ivo Emanuel Gonçalves a écrit :
> Also, another correction that you may want to do:
> Over the Introduction section, Speex is described as "Free
> software/open-source". I believe this should be replaced altogether
> with "Patent-free and royalty-free. Specification under the Public
No, keep as is. It is definitely not public domain, since it's
BSD-licensed and "patent-free" will open futile and unnecessary
discussions (on what it's supposed to mean) at the IETF.
> Or something like this. Calling Speex free software/open source looks
> to me more like a buzzword, than an actual useful comment.
> Furthermore, many companies do not trust so-called FLOSS projects.
Do you have any company names? Even Microsoft loves BSD software.
More information about the Speex-dev