[Speex-dev] Preprocessor denoise. Does it work?
jean-marc.valin at usherbrooke.ca
Tue Feb 27 19:54:59 PST 2007
There are many ways to implement a VAD. What you described is actually
perfectly equivalent to the most trivial (and least robust) VAD algorithm.
Andy Ross wrote:
> Ton Grandgent wrote:
>> Andy Ross wrotte:
>>> I wrote a trivial squelch feature* in 10 minutes that works
>>> basically 100% of the time.
>> Could you please explain how this differs from VAD?
> Not knowing how VAD works, I can't say for sure. But enabling
> VAD wasn't catching the existing transients (see original post),
> and this does. So at the very least it differs in threshold.
> Speex-dev mailing list
> Speex-dev at xiph.org
More information about the Speex-dev