[Speex-dev] error during make while installing Linphone-1.5.1
David Hogan
david.hogan at freshtel.net
Thu Feb 15 22:04:16 PST 2007
"cc1: warnings being treated as errors"
Have you tried asking the Linphone community for support?
Dave
> -----Original Message-----
> From: speex-dev-bounces at xiph.org
> [mailto:speex-dev-bounces at xiph.org] On Behalf Of venkatram mustoor
> Sent: Friday, 16 February 2007 3:39 PM
> To: speex-dev at xiph.org
> Subject: [Speex-dev] error during make while installing Linphone-1.5.1
>
> Hi All,
>
> I am getting this error during make.
>
> please help me./
> speexec.c: In function `speex_ec_process':
> speexec.c:112: syntax error before "noise"
> cc1: warnings being treated as errors
> speexec.c:133: warning: implicit declaration of function
> `speex_echo_state_reset'
> speexec.c:148: warning: passing arg 5 of `speex_echo_cancel' makes
> pointer from integer without a cast
> speexec.c:149: warning: comparison between pointer and integer
> speexec.c:150: warning: passing arg 3 of `speex_preprocess' makes
> pointer from integer without a cast
>
> make[3]: *** [speexec.lo] Error 1
>
> make[3]: Leaving directory
> `/home/umesh/IPPHONE/linphone-1.5.1/mediastreamer2/src'
> make[2]: *** [all] Error 2
> make[2]: Leaving directory
> `/home/umesh/IPPHONE/linphone-1.5.1/mediastreamer2/src'
> make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory
> `/home/umesh/IPPHONE/linphone-1.5.1/mediastreamer2'
> make: *** [all] Error 2
>
>
> This is the second time i putting this error, please help me.
>
>
>
> On 2/6/07, speex-dev-request at xiph.org
> <speex-dev-request at xiph.org> wrote:
> > Send Speex-dev mailing list submissions to
> > speex-dev at xiph.org
> >
> > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> > http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/speex-dev
> > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> > speex-dev-request at xiph.org
> >
> > You can reach the person managing the list at
> > speex-dev-owner at xiph.org
> >
> > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> > than "Re: Contents of Speex-dev digest..."
> >
> >
> > Today's Topics:
> >
> > 1. RE: Speex and RTP (David Hogan)
> > 2. Re: Speex and RTP (Jean-Marc Valin)
> > 3. Call for Xiph online meeting in 7th Feb (this Wednesday) at
> > 18:00 UTC ( Ivo Emanuel Gon?alves )
> >
> >
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 1
> > Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 10:25:37 +1100
> > From: "David Hogan" <david.hogan at freshtel.net>
> > Subject: RE: [Speex-dev] Speex and RTP
> > To: "Randy Schefiele" <scheifele2001 at yahoo.com>,
> <speex-dev at xiph.org>
> > Message-ID:
> >
> <971FA0386407DE4096E96382F4E3AD4443CA31 at Mail01.mel.au.office.f
> reshtel.net>
> >
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> >
> > Hi Randy,
> >
> > One thing I would note is that speex is designed for 8kHz, 16kHz or
> > 32kHz. 160 samples is equal to 20ms of 8kHz audio. Have you tried
> > resampling from 11.025kHz to 8kHz and then using the speex
> 8kHz mode?
> > (nb, or narrow band). Or, if you want to preserve the
> higher quality of
> > your 11.025kHz sample rate, resample to 16kHz and use the
> wideband speex
> > encoder.
> >
> > I believe there is new resampling functionality in the
> speex svn head,
> > although I haven't tested it yet. You might also want to check out
> > 'Secret Rabbit Code' for your resampling.
> >
> > Hope this helps.
> > Dave
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> >
> > From: speex-dev-bounces at xiph.org
> > [mailto:speex-dev-bounces at xiph.org] On Behalf Of Randy Schefiele
> > Sent: Saturday, 3 February 2007 7:12 AM
> > To: speex-dev at xiph.org
> > Subject: [Speex-dev] Speex and RTP
> >
> >
> > Hi -
> >
> > I am currently developing a RTSP/RTP/SDP solution to stream
> > Speex encoded data. Using my current source, I have successfully
> > streamed u-law and PCM encoded audio but have been
> unsuccessful thus far
> > with Speex.
> >
> > Because of some constraints of my system, I am
> encoding audio at
> > 11.025kHz. I am still using the 160 samples per frame
> which makes my
> > frame size 28 bytes. I have successfully written the SDP needed to
> > describe the Speex stream but I haven't found a player that
> will play
> > the stream. I could be doing something wrong, but does
> anyone know of
> > any players that can play RTP Speex streams so I can be sure that my
> > solution is incorrect?
> >
> > Also, I have looked over the draft RFC of the Speex
> RTP payload
> > and I was curious to know if, because I am not using a
> standard sample
> > rate, my solution will work. In the draft RFC (and the
> Speex manual for
> > that matter) it always refers to Speex frames containing
> 20ms of audio.
> > In my case, a Speex frame actually contains roughly 14.5 seconds of
> > audio. Am I going to need to hack the Speex encoder to
> make my frames
> > be 20ms in order for the RTP to successfully play?
> >
> > Any advice/help anyone can give would be greatly appreciated.
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Randy
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> >
> > The fish are biting.
> > Get more visitors
> >
> <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=49679/*http://searchmarketing.yaho
> o.com/arp/
> >
> sponsoredsearch_v2.php?o=US2140&cmp=Yahoo&ctv=Q107Tagline&s=Y&
> s2=EM&b=50
> > > on your site using Yahoo! Search Marketing.
> >
> <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=49679/*http://searchmarketing.yaho
> o.com/arp/
> >
> sponsoredsearch_v2.php?o=US2140&cmp=Yahoo&ctv=Q107Tagline&s=Y&
> s2=EM&b=50
> > >
> >
> > -------------- next part --------------
> > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> > URL:
> http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20070205
> /bf8a6a16/attachment-0001.html
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 2
> > Date: Mon, 05 Feb 2007 21:26:30 +1100
> > From: Jean-Marc Valin <jean-marc.valin at usherbrooke.ca>
> > Subject: Re: [Speex-dev] Speex and RTP
> > To: David Hogan <david.hogan at freshtel.net>
> > Cc: speex-dev at xiph.org
> > Message-ID: <45C70656.9090401 at usherbrooke.ca>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> >
> > > I believe there is new resampling functionality in the
> speex svn head,
> > > although I haven't tested it yet. You might also want to check out
> > > 'Secret Rabbit Code' for your resampling.
> >
> > Yes, I've just been working on a resampler recently. Its
> changing a lot,
> > but it's now usable. I'd actually be quite happy to have
> some feedback
> > on it.
> >
> > Jean-Marc
> >
> >
> > > Hope this helps.
> > > Dave
> > >
> > >
> > > ________________________________
> > >
> > > From: speex-dev-bounces at xiph.org
> > > [mailto:speex-dev-bounces at xiph.org] On Behalf Of Randy Schefiele
> > > Sent: Saturday, 3 February 2007 7:12 AM
> > > To: speex-dev at xiph.org
> > > Subject: [Speex-dev] Speex and RTP
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi -
> > >
> > > I am currently developing a RTSP/RTP/SDP solution to stream
> > > Speex encoded data. Using my current source, I have successfully
> > > streamed u-law and PCM encoded audio but have been
> unsuccessful thus far
> > > with Speex.
> > >
> > > Because of some constraints of my system, I am
> encoding audio at
> > > 11.025kHz. I am still using the 160 samples per frame
> which makes my
> > > frame size 28 bytes. I have successfully written the SDP
> needed to
> > > describe the Speex stream but I haven't found a player
> that will play
> > > the stream. I could be doing something wrong, but does
> anyone know of
> > > any players that can play RTP Speex streams so I can be
> sure that my
> > > solution is incorrect?
> > >
> > > Also, I have looked over the draft RFC of the Speex
> RTP payload
> > > and I was curious to know if, because I am not using a
> standard sample
> > > rate, my solution will work. In the draft RFC (and the
> Speex manual for
> > > that matter) it always refers to Speex frames containing
> 20ms of audio.
> > > In my case, a Speex frame actually contains roughly 14.5
> seconds of
> > > audio. Am I going to need to hack the Speex encoder to
> make my frames
> > > be 20ms in order for the RTP to successfully play?
> > >
> > > Any advice/help anyone can give would be greatly
> appreciated.
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > > Randy
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ________________________________
> > >
> > > The fish are biting.
> > > Get more visitors
> > >
> <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=49679/*http://searchmarketing.yaho
> o.com/arp/
> > >
> sponsoredsearch_v2.php?o=US2140&cmp=Yahoo&ctv=Q107Tagline&s=Y&
> s2=EM&b=50
> > >> on your site using Yahoo! Search Marketing.
> > >
> <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=49679/*http://searchmarketing.yaho
> o.com/arp/
> > >
> sponsoredsearch_v2.php?o=US2140&cmp=Yahoo&ctv=Q107Tagline&s=Y&
> s2=EM&b=50
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Speex-dev mailing list
> > > Speex-dev at xiph.org
> > > http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/speex-dev
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 3
> > Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 17:40:32 +0000
> > From: " Ivo Emanuel Gon?alves " <justivo at gmail.com>
> > Subject: [Speex-dev] Call for Xiph online meeting in 7th Feb (this
> > Wednesday) at 18:00 UTC
> > To: Vorbis at xiph.org, vorbis-dev at xiph.org, flac-dev at xiph.org,
> > Speex-dev at xiph.org, theora-dev at xiph.org, "New
> playlist format
> > discussion" <playlist at lists.musicbrainz.org>,
> advocacy at xiph.org,
> > ogg-dev at xiph.org
> > Message-ID:
> > <dc107ee70702050940t5d7e4f7tda7da6dfe93a40f2 at mail.gmail.com>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
> >
> > Agenda
> >
> > * aoTuV Release 1 merge
> > * trac / trac cleaning
> > * hosting for SpreadOgg project
> > * Status of projects? libogg2
> > * How can we make the services (esp. mailing lists and
> svn) more stable?
> > * Will the Ambisonics discussion lead anywhere good?
> > * contributors/webmasters
> > * can someone bother to create a BSD-licensed libXSPF library to
> > be hosted on Xiph?
> >
> > The agenda may be edited at
> http://wiki.xiph.org/index.php/MonthlyMeeting200702
> >
> > Is the time convenient for everyone?
> >
> > -Ivo
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Speex-dev mailing list
> > Speex-dev at xiph.org
> > http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/speex-dev
> >
> >
> > End of Speex-dev Digest, Vol 33, Issue 5
> > ****************************************
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Speex-dev mailing list
> Speex-dev at xiph.org
> http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/speex-dev
>
More information about the Speex-dev
mailing list