[speex-dev] Speex-RTP RFC questions

Jean-Marc Valin Jean-Marc.Valin at USherbrooke.ca
Sat Feb 28 08:04:44 PST 2004

Le sam 28/02/2004 à 07:05, Greg Herlein a écrit :
> > This portion of the RFC is gramatically incorrect and
> > confusing:
> > 
> >     The RTP payload MUST be padded to provide an integer number of
> >     octets as the payload length.  These padding bits MUST be all zero.
> >     This padding is only required for the last frame in the packet, and
> >     only to ensure the packet contents ends on an octet boundary.
> I'm updating the internet draft for the RTP profile, and note 
> your comment... but it looks OK to me, and looks like we need it 
> still.

Didn't we change that paragraph to "These padding bits MUST be a zero
followed by all ones."?


Jean-Marc Valin, M.Sc.A., ing. jr.
LABORIUS (http://www.gel.usherb.ca/laborius)
Université de Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée.
Url : http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20040228/e02b68dc/signature-0001.pgp

More information about the Speex-dev mailing list