AW: [speex-dev] SPEEX_SET_USER_HANDLER once again
Jean-Marc.Valin at USherbrooke.ca
Fri Nov 7 12:02:34 PST 2003
Le ven 07/11/2003 à 13:37, Norman Biehl a écrit :
> Jean-Marc wrote:
> >I think what happened is that you did not write the "message" length.
> >With user-callbacks, you also need to say how large the message. The
> >size is in bytes and encoded in 4 bits.
> I wonder what is correct. Inside speex the documentation was written
> that the size in byte is encoded within 5 bit.
> I changed the code in both ways, but it doesn't work anytime. It's the
> same problem. See below.
I guess you'll need to somehow trace what's happening.
> >Besides, you're probably the first one to use user-callbacks.
> Oh, I feel honoured. :-)
> Why does it contain this feature if nobody uses it? I think it's a good
> and very flexible feature (if it works :-)).
I thought it could be useful in some cases, but you're the first to find
a use for it.
> >BTW, why
> >didn't you want to use Ogg. It's much simpler to use and overhead can
> >made minimal anyway.
> At first there is no need for ogg, the programm is only for encoding
> voice in a test environment.
> And if the user in-band callback mechanism works it is more then enough.
The reason I suggest Ogg is that it takes care of everything. It makes
the file readable everywhere and I don't see any reason not to use it.
Jean-Marc Valin, M.Sc.A., ing. jr.
Université de Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
Url : http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20031107/40166edd/signature.pgp
More information about the Speex-dev