[paranoia] New mobo == slower cdparanoia
Bill Davidsen
davidsen at tmr.com
Mon Feb 2 10:27:46 PST 2004
On Wed, 28 Jan 2004, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> Before a few weeks ago, I had an Athlon CPU/VIA chipset
> motherboard with Ultra66 IDE channels. I had a Compaq CD-ROM hooked up
> to the VIA IDE channels, and a Promise controller for my hard drives.
>
> I recently upgraded to an Athlon XP and a new VIA chipset
> motherboard. Now, my hard drives are on the faster, newer VIA channels
> and my CD-ROM is on a Promise controller.
>
> Other than that nothing has changed - same exact
> drives/cables/etc.
>
> However, cdparanoia is a lot slower and less reliable than
> before. The first combination would rip and encode an average length CD
> in maybe 10-20 minutes with max paranoia enabled (-z). I only ever saw
> '-', '+', or '!' when the media had been scratched/abused.
>
> The new configuration stinks - cdparanoia feels like its taking
> real-time to rip. It's easily getting hung up on tracks. Tons of '-',
> '+' for every song on every CD I've tried ripping, even new and pristine
> discs.
>
> I'm using ide-scsi emulation on 2.4.23, and was before as well.
> Is there a chance it's a problem with the Promise card? Any suggestions
> for improving this non-optimal situation?
Check that DMA is enabled for your CD.
--
bill davidsen <davidsen at tmr.com>
CTO, TMR Associates, Inc
Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979.
--- >8 ----
List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Paranoia homepage: http://www.xiph.org/paranoia/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'paranoia-request at xiph.org'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed.
Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.
More information about the Paranoia
mailing list