[paranoia] Re: Bug, and a suggestion

[Erik]

Greetings again,
     I wrote my original email without acually looking at the CDParanoia code, 
and that was a mistake. Having now done so, I find the code emminently readable 
and have in fact implemented the changes tothe output I suggested (and modified 
the -q option, and added a new -L option). With that out of the way, I turned to 
fixing the actual bug in the Paranoia II library and I find that I need a little 
direction. I found that transport layer errors normally don't get sent to the 
callback (in main.c), and so I was considering two options:
   1) Adding a new PARANOIA_MODE flag which would cause transport errors tb 
trated as skips (checked for in scsi_interface.c:scsi_read_map())
   2) Add a new PARANOIA_CB callback (ie. PARANOIA_CB_INVALID_SECTOR)

Any feelings one way or the other, or do you have another suggestion?

I'm currently in favor of #1 as it is the most backward compatible, but #2 would 
allow more control...

Sincerely,
   - Erik Lindsley

<p>--- >8 ----
List archives:  http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Paranoia homepage: http://www.xiph.org/paranoia/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'paranoia-request at xiph.org'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body.  No subject is needed.
Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.