[paranoia] can cdparanoia (version III release 9.7) use larger read sizes?

[Wolfgang Weisselberg]

Hi, Tkil!

Trying to kill the keyboard, Tkil (tkil at scrye.com)
produced 2,8K in 86 lines:

> |         maximum theoretical transfer: 1769 sectors
> |         Setting default read size to 13 sectors (30576 bytes).

> Looking at that last bit, should I be trying to use a larger read
> size?  Is cdparanoia already using the larger read size, and I'm just
> misreading this diagnostic?  Are there advantages to using a larger
> read size?

--force-default-sectors n
    (This option should generally not be used.)
man cdparanoia!

-Wolfgang

--- >8 ----
List archives:  http://www.xiph.org/archives/
Paranoia homepage: http://www.xiph.org/paranoia/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'paranoia-request at xiph.org'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body.  No subject is needed.
Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.