[opus] (no subject)
Jean-Marc Valin
jmvalin at jmvalin.ca
Fri May 8 10:30:34 PDT 2015
Hi,
Can you apply this change to the MDCT test and run it again. See if more
(all) sizes pass. Given the results, I strongly suspect an overflow.
Jean-Marc
On 08/05/15 01:21 PM, Viswanath Puttagunta wrote:
> Hello Jean-Marc,
>
> Below are the results that show test_unit_dft passes, but
> test_unit_mdct fails (only for nfft=480, 960, 1920)
> Note: Tested on BeagleboneBlack(Cortex-A8) fixed point on branch [1]
>
> ./test_unit_dft
> nfft=32 inverse=0,snr = 88.394372
> nfft=32 inverse=1,snr = 93.896470
> nfft=128 inverse=0,snr = 89.185895
> nfft=128 inverse=1,snr = 93.537021
> nfft=256 inverse=0,snr = 88.353151
> nfft=256 inverse=1,snr = 90.826012
> nfft=36 inverse=0,snr = 87.883324
> nfft=36 inverse=1,snr = 88.161852
> nfft=50 inverse=0,snr = 84.841953
> nfft=50 inverse=1,snr = 86.312280
> nfft=60 inverse=0,snr = 142.086642
> nfft=60 inverse=1,snr = 140.223589
> nfft=120 inverse=0,snr = 139.717566
> nfft=120 inverse=1,snr = 135.677978
> nfft=240 inverse=0,snr = 137.783374
> nfft=240 inverse=1,snr = 131.742062
> nfft=480 inverse=0,snr = 137.329389
> nfft=480 inverse=1,snr = 125.394139
>
>
> Testing test_unit_mdct
>
> nfft=32 inverse=0,snr = 85.342660
> nfft=32 inverse=1,snr = 96.283780
> nfft=256 inverse=0,snr = 86.729952
> nfft=256 inverse=1,snr = 87.326203
> nfft=512 inverse=0,snr = 82.575740
> nfft=512 inverse=1,snr = 87.088448
> nfft=1024 inverse=0,snr = 84.944481
> nfft=1024 inverse=1,snr = 86.939423
> nfft=2048 inverse=0,snr = 84.754290
> nfft=2048 inverse=1,snr = 86.859531
> nfft=36 inverse=0,snr = 84.423668
> nfft=36 inverse=1,snr = 86.638850
> nfft=40 inverse=0,snr = 83.808312
> nfft=40 inverse=1,snr = 87.403083
> nfft=60 inverse=0,snr = 84.983050
> nfft=60 inverse=1,snr = 88.736219
> nfft=120 inverse=0,snr = 82.342631
> nfft=120 inverse=1,snr = 84.941462
> nfft=240 inverse=0,snr = 88.011018
> nfft=240 inverse=1,snr = 88.410825
>
> nfft=480 inverse=0,snr = 9.016824
> ** poor snr: 9.016824 **
>
> nfft=480 inverse=1,snr = 87.773827
>
> nfft=960 inverse=0,snr = 11.813777
> ** poor snr: 11.813777 **
>
> nfft=960 inverse=1,snr = 88.283572
>
> nfft=1920 inverse=0,snr = 7.652986
> ** poor snr: 7.652986 **
>
> nfft=1920 inverse=1,snr = 87.762925
>
>
> Thanks,
> Vish
>
> [1]: https://git.linaro.org/people/viswanath.puttagunta/opus.git/shortlog/refs/heads/rfcv2_fft_fixed_exp
>
>
> On 8 May 2015 at 12:06, Jean-Marc Valin <jmvalin at jmvalin.ca> wrote:
>> Is the actual output of the test posted somewhere? One thing I would
>> suspect is that the test might use values that trigger overflows not
>> generally triggered with audio.
>>
>> Jean-Marc
>>
>> On 08/05/15 11:08 AM, Viswanath Puttagunta wrote:
>>> Hello Timothy,
>>>
>>> Just FYI, Phil at ARM is still looking into why mdct is failing.. will
>>> keep you posted. In the mean time, do you want me to disable NE10 for
>>> mdct_forward and re-submit the patchset so we may make progress?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Vish
>>>
>>> On 30 April 2015 at 09:33, Viswanath Puttagunta
>>> <viswanath.puttagunta at linaro.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 29 April 2015 at 17:22, Timothy B. Terriberry <tterribe at xiph.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Viswanath Puttagunta wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This patch series is follow up on work I posted on [1].
>>>>>> In addition to what was posted on [1], this patch series mainly
>>>>>> integrates Fixed point FFT implementations in NE10 library into opus.
>>>>>> You can view my opus wip code at [2].
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks, and I apologize for being slow here.
>>>>>
>>>>>> - This was surprising to me because test_unit_dft passes for all
>>>>>> nfft including 60, 120, 240, 480. May be there are some data
>>>>>> corner cases that need further investigation.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, that seems concerning. I'd like to at least understand the cause of the failures. "Audio is clearly audible" is not a very strong test for encoder quality regressions, but in the worst case we could just disable NE10 for mdct_forward.
>>>>
>>>> Yes, agree we need to root cause this.. I only mentioned audio is
>>>> audible clearly to point out that NE10 fft is not completely messed
>>>> up, but does have some corner cases where it is failing. ARM folks are
>>>> actively looking into this issue, and expecting some resolution next
>>>> week.
>>>>
>>>> Also, this NE10 fixed fft issue only impacts patches
>>>> armv7,armv8: Optimize fixed point fft using NE10 library
>>>> armv7,armv8: Extend fixed fft NE10 optimizations to mdct
>>>>
>>>> In the mean time, do you want me (as you suggested) disable NE10 fixed
>>>> fft for mdct_forward? That way when it gets fixed in NE10, it will
>>>> just be a one line change patch that will follow.
>>>>
>>>> Either way, request that we make progress on review/merge rest of the patches.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> opus mailing list
>>> opus at xiph.org
>>> http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/opus
>>>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: test_mdct_scale.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 364 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/opus/attachments/20150508/f4898eaf/attachment.bin
More information about the opus
mailing list