[opus] Opus multi-stream/surround: Audio corruption on decoded content
Jean-Marc Valin
jmvalin at jmvalin.ca
Wed Apr 1 18:44:22 PDT 2015
The Opus multistream API uses the Vorbis channel ordering. The order is:
L, R, C, RL, RR, LFE
So the last channel is the LFE, which Opus encodes with a much narrower
bandwidth and a much lower bitrate. I suspect you are just feeding the
data in the wav order, which is different. In wav 5.1, the last channel
is RR, which is probably the channel that got attenuated for you.
Jean-Marc
On 01/04/15 09:12 PM, Mukund Raman wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
>
>
>
> I am using the opus 1.1 multistream APIs to encode a 5.1 surround stream
> on the server, stream it to client, decode it and capture the pcm data.
> I noticed that there was severe corruption/attenuation on one of the
> channels(specifically Back/Rear Right). This would appear to be the last
> channel in the stream. I am attaching an image of the PCM dumps from the
> original and the one decoded on the client which shows the channel
> corruption. If required I can also provide the source and destination
> wav files. The track I am trying to play is purely speech data, however,
> it has been formatted as Hi-Definition content (16 bit LPCM, 48 KHz).
> I’d like to add that I have also tried a simple loopback test; where I
> read from ‘the’ source file encode it, immediately decode the encoded
> buffer and write to a output file and I am seeing the same kind of
> corruption. Since my actual use-case will involve mixed media content,
> i.e. typically voice and music, I was a bit concerned about this.
>
>
>
> If the file purely has music(and no speech), I do notice some
> attenuation, however, it does not suffer from any distortions.
>
>
>
> Following is the code I am using for initializing the opus multi-stream
> encoder: -
>
>
>
> <code>
>
>
>
> <defines and vars>
>
>
>
> #defineCHANNELS 6
>
> #defineOPUS_SURROUND_MAPPING_FAMILY1
>
> #defineSAMPLE_RATE48000
>
>
>
> typedefuniont_SurroundInfo
>
> {
>
> unsignedcharsurroundInfo[1];
>
> struct
>
> {
>
> unsignedchar channels;
>
> unsignedchar streams;
>
> unsignedchar coupled_streams;
>
> unsignedchar channel_mapping[MAX_SURROUND_CHANNELS];
>
> }s;
>
> }SurroundInfo;
>
>
>
> </defines and vars>
>
>
>
> <encoder>
>
>
>
> intstreams = 0; intcoupled_streams = 0;
>
> m_SurroundInfo.s.channels = CHANNELS; // set to 6
>
> m_MSEnc = opus_multistream_surround_encoder_create(SAMPLE_RATE,
> // SAMPLE_RATE = 48000
>
> m_SurroundInfo.s.channels,
>
> OPUS_SURROUND_MAPPING_FAMILY,
>
> &streams,
>
> &coupled_streams,
>
> m_SurroundInfo.s.channel_mapping,
>
> OPUS_APPLICATION_RESTRICTED_LOWDELAY,
>
> &err
>
> );
>
> if(err != OPUS_OK)
>
> return;
>
>
>
> m_SurroundInfo.s.streams = (unsignedchar)streams;
>
> m_SurroundInfo.s.coupled_streams = (unsignedchar)coupled_streams;
>
>
>
> opus_multistream_encoder_ctl(m_MSEnc, OPUS_SET_BITRATE(bitRate));
>
> opus_multistream_encoder_ctl(m_MSEnc,
> OPUS_SET_BANDWIDTH(OPUS_AUTO));
>
> opus_multistream_encoder_ctl(m_MSEnc, OPUS_SET_VBR(0));
>
> opus_multistream_encoder_ctl(m_MSEnc, OPUS_SET_VBR_CONSTRAINT(0));
>
> opus_multistream_encoder_ctl(m_MSEnc, OPUS_SET_COMPLEXITY(10));
>
> opus_multistream_encoder_ctl(m_MSEnc, OPUS_SET_INBAND_FEC(0));
>
> opus_multistream_encoder_ctl(m_MSEnc,
> OPUS_SET_FORCE_CHANNELS(OPUS_AUTO));
>
> opus_multistream_encoder_ctl(m_MSEnc, OPUS_SET_DTX(0));
>
> opus_multistream_encoder_ctl(m_MSEnc, OPUS_SET_PACKET_LOSS_PERC(0));
>
> opus_multistream_encoder_ctl(m_MSEnc,
> OPUS_SET_FORCE_MODE(MODE_CELT_ONLY));
>
>
>
> </encoder>
>
>
>
> <decoder>
>
>
>
> intstreams = (int)m_SurroundInfo.s.streams; intcoupled_streams =
> (int)m_SurroundInfo.s.coupled_streams;
>
> m_MSDec = opus_multistream_decoder_create(SAMPLE_RATE,
>
> m_SurroundInfo.s.channels,
>
> streams,
>
> coupled_streams,
>
> m_SurroundInfo.s.channel_mapping,
>
> &err
>
> );
>
>
>
> </decoder>
>
>
>
> </code>
>
>
>
>
>
> I’d appreciate it, if someone can shed some light on why the observed
> phenomenon is occurring. Could it just be that, I am playing a content
> that only has speech and actually forcing opus mode to CELT?
>
>
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
>
>
> Warm regards,
>
>
>
> Mukund.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and
> may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized review, use,
> disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
> recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all
> copies of the original message.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> opus mailing list
> opus at xiph.org
> http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/opus
>
More information about the opus
mailing list