[CELT-dev] Possible bug in CELT's VBR code
John Ridges
jridges at masque.com
Tue Mar 1 07:51:51 PST 2011
Hi Jean-Marc,
This file (celt.c) is the one I got out of the celt-0.11.1.tar.gz
tarbal. Is is possible that the 0.11.1 release doesn't have the latest code?
John Ridges
On 2/28/2011 6:48 PM, Jean-Marc Valin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm not sure what version you're using (this code no longer exists),
> but you should be aware that VBR was pretty broken until version 0.10.
> If you're using something earlier than 0.10, I recommend either
> upgrading or using CBR.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Jean-Marc
>
> On 11-02-28 07:55 PM, John Ridges wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> It looks to me like line 955 in celt.c should be:
>>
>> effectiveBytes = vbr_rate>>(3+BITRES);
>>
>> otherwise it seems like "effectiveBytes" is 8 times larger than it
>> should be (at least if it's really meant to be bytes).
>>
>> Cheers,
>> John Ridges
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> celt-dev mailing list
>> celt-dev at xiph.org
>> http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/celt-dev
>>
>>
>
>
More information about the celt-dev
mailing list