[CELT-dev] Possible Bug

Jean-Marc Valin Jean-Marc.Valin at USherbrooke.ca
Thu Sep 2 06:14:23 PDT 2010


Riccardo Micci <riccardo.micci at cambridgeconsultants.com> a écrit :
> (s=ec_decode_raw(_this,_ftb);).
> In ec_decode_raw within the while loop the following line is executed:
> value |= _this->end_byte>>(8-_this->end_bits_left)<<count;
> As you can see end_byte is read and used before nothing else has written
> in it before.
> This produce different results on different platforms.

When executing
value |= _this->end_byte>>(8-_this->end_bits_left)<<count;
the first time, the value of _this->end_bits_left should be equal to  
0, which means that we are shifting _this->end_byte (an unsigned char)  
by 8, so the result should be zero regardless of the content of  
_this->end_byte. Can you check whether _this->end_bits_left is really  
zero when you see the problem happening? It could be either the  
symptoms of an unrelated issue or something wrong with your build  
setup. On what platform do you see the problem occurring (any chance  
it's one with 16-bit chars)?

Cheers,

    Jean-Marc

> Regards
> Riccardo
>
> Riccardo Micci
> Senior DSP Engineer, Wireless Group
> Cambridge Consultants
> Science Park, Milton Road
> Cambridge, CB4 0DW, England
> Switchboard: +44 (0)1223 420024
> Direct dial: +44 (0)1223 392402
> Mobile: +44 (0)
> Fax: +44 (0)1223 423373
> riccardo.micci at cambridgeconsultants.com
> www.CambridgeConsultants.com
>
>
>
>
>
> Jean-Marc Valin <Jean-Marc.Valin at USherbrooke.ca>
> 02/09/2010 13:41
>
> To
> celt-dev at xiph.org
> cc
> riccardo.micci at cambridgeconsultants.com
> Subject
> Re: [CELT-dev] Possible Bug
>
>
>
>
>
>
>> The problem comes decoding the next frame. Since now "shortBlocks" is
> false,
>> "end_byte" is not initialized anymore and next functions read it before
>> update.
>>
>> Can someone confirm this behaviour? In my case i modified ec_dec_init
>> function to initialize it as well. What is the correct value?
>
> Can you give a bit more information on what's happening? The end_byte
> field does not need to be initialized because it should get read when
> end_bits_left is zero. In what function is the uninitialized read
> happening and what happens then?
>
>     Jean-Marc
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> This email is from Cambridge Consultants Limited, Science Park, Milton
> Road, Cambridge CB4 0DW with registered number 1036298 England. It may
> contain confidential information. It is intended for the addressee only
> and may not be copied or disclosed to any third party without our
> permission. If you are not the intended recipient please contact the
> sender as soon as possible and delete the material from any computer. If
> this email has been sent as a personal message to the addressee, the
> sender is not acting in his/her capacity as an employee or officer of
> Cambridge Consultants Limited and no liability is accepted for the content
> of any such email. Outgoing email may be monitored for the purpose of
> ensuring compliance with our email policy and relevant laws.
>
>
>






More information about the celt-dev mailing list