[CELT-dev] Variable frame size and API changes

[Thorvald Natvig]

Hi,

Since CELT is intended primarily as a low-latency codec for "live" 
material, is transcoding likely to be needed?

Best Regards,
Thorvald


Dennis Heerema wrote:
> Hi There,
>  
> 44.1 Khz is the most used samplerate, downsampling is really something 
> you want to avoid.
> But then again it depends on where you want to use the codec for.
> I mean for a voip app, it doesn't really mather the lack of 44.1, 
> either you choose 32Khz of 48Khz for quality standards you might wish 
> / need.
> But when transcoding existing recorded material from format X to 
> Celt...then it could be negative to not have the option of 44.1 Khz 
> samplingfreq.
>  
> regards,
>
> Dennis
>  
> --
>
> Het is een raar fenomeen.
> Maar echte Amsterdammers wonen er 20 kilometer omheen!!
>
> Quote Marije en Dennis
>
>     -----Original Message-----
>     From: "Mike Hooper" <mihooper at bellsouth.net>
>     To: <celt-dev at xiph.org>
>     Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 08:40:48 -0400
>     Subject: [CELT-dev]  Variable frame size and API changes
>
>     Jean-Marc,
>      
>     I hate to see the loss of flexibility (ie 44.1). How about a
>     CFR/VFR switch so that you accommodate both variable and fixed
>     frame sizes? Or does this complicate the code too much?
>      
>     MikeH
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> celt-dev mailing list
> celt-dev at xiph.org
> http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/celt-dev
>