[CELT-dev] Implications of reducing MAX_PERIOD

Jean-Marc Valin jean-marc.valin at usherbrooke.ca
Fri Oct 23 04:00:31 PDT 2009


If you don't need packet loss concealment *and* you don't need the
encoder, then you can simply make it equal to zero.

Cheers,

	Jean-Marc

Chen-Po Sun a écrit :
> Hi,
> 
> I have been looking into reducing memory usage of the CELTDecoder and
> was wondering what the implications of reducing MAX_PERIOD were?
> Reducing it to 512, I haven't noticed any difference besides the
> reduction in memory usage. Is there a minimum value this can be set to?
> 
> -- 
> *Chen-Po Sun* | Programmer
> Firelight Technologies Pty Ltd.
> FMOD Sound System | www.fmod.org
> PH: +61 3 96635947 Fax: +61 3 96635951
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> celt-dev mailing list
> celt-dev at xiph.org
> http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/celt-dev


More information about the celt-dev mailing list