tool to add skeleton (was Re: [Vorbis-dev] Re: [ogg-dev] Peer
review draft for the new)
silviapfeiffer1 at gmail.com
Tue Oct 16 14:43:22 PDT 2007
I'm terribly snowed under right now, so if you could wait till the
beginning of next week before submitting, that would be very much
appreciated. I really wanted to go through in detail again.
On 10/17/07, Ivo Emanuel Gonçalves <justivo at gmail.com> wrote:
> Draft updated with all references. I suppose it's safe to convert to
> XML to make sure pagination is fine and then submit it. I'll wait two
> more days in case someone wants to add, comment, or fix something. Is
> this fair?
> More below.
> On 10/3/07, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > There is actually an I-D that Luca is writing
> > for audio/vorbis at
> > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-avt-rtp-vorbis-07.txt
> That document states that RTP Vorbis needs a special media type for
> configuration data. What is this exactly? Is it really necessary? I
> never saw RTP payload formats using a configuration-only media type.
> Then again, I only read the draft briefly, so most likely there may be
> a reason to have it. Doesn't hurt to ask, though.
> > And we should start using audio/vorbis where it is appropriate instead
> > of audio/x-vorbis.
> I agree with this. And the new Ogg media types. While looking for
> references for that draft, I found that most if not all documentation
> related with Ogg, Vorbis, Theora, and Speex state old (application/ogg
> only) or x-like media types. This should be fixed. With permission
> I'll try to fix those that are basic HTML -- PDF files made from LaTeX
> without the original TeX are out my scope.
More information about the ogg-dev