tool to add skeleton (was Re: [Vorbis-dev] Re: [ogg-dev] Peer review draft for the new)

Silvia Pfeiffer silviapfeiffer1 at
Tue Oct 16 14:43:22 PDT 2007


I'm terribly snowed under right now, so if you could wait till the
beginning of next week before submitting, that would be very much
appreciated. I really wanted to go through  in detail again.


On 10/17/07, Ivo Emanuel Gonçalves <justivo at> wrote:
> Draft updated with all references.  I suppose it's safe to convert to
> XML to make sure pagination is fine and then submit it.  I'll wait two
> more days in case someone wants to add, comment, or fix something.  Is
> this fair?
> More below.
> On 10/3/07, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1 at> wrote:
> > There is actually an I-D that Luca is writing
> > for audio/vorbis at
> >
> That document states that RTP Vorbis needs a special media type for
> configuration data.  What is this exactly?  Is it really necessary?  I
> never saw RTP payload formats using a configuration-only media type.
> Then again, I only read the draft briefly, so most likely there may be
> a reason to have it.  Doesn't hurt to ask, though.
> > And we should start using audio/vorbis where it is appropriate instead
> > of audio/x-vorbis.
> I agree with this.  And the new Ogg media types.  While looking for
> references for that draft, I found that most if not all documentation
> related with Ogg, Vorbis, Theora, and Speex state old (application/ogg
> only) or x-like media types.  This should be fixed.  With permission
> I'll try to fix those that are basic HTML -- PDF files made from LaTeX
> without the original TeX are out my scope.
> -Ivo

More information about the ogg-dev mailing list