[ogg-dev] Ambisonics und OggPCM

Conrad Parker conrad at metadecks.org
Mon Nov 14 16:20:14 PST 2005

On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 09:43:26AM +1100, Silvia.Pfeiffer at csiro.au wrote:
> I therefore suggest: LET'S TAKE A VOTE and decide on which format to continue developing.
>    WHO prefers we continue working as a community on development of
>    (1) OggPCM or
>    (2) OggPCM2?

(2) OggPCM2

However, this vote is about a community process, not about the specifics of
a particular format; both specifications are still under development.

OggPCM has been under development under the leadership of Arc. Arc
has managed to insult and abuse every contributor to that specification,
through private email and private IRC messages, as well as in public
email, IRC and Wiki comments. Arc, whether or not that was your intention,
your actions over the past week have been destructive to our community.
Please stop.

Leading the design of such a specification is a difficult task requiring
not only technical skill and familiarity with the subject, but also
the social grace to develop consensus.


More information about the ogg-dev mailing list