[ogg-dev] OggPCM version / header finalization
Ralph Giles
giles at xiph.org
Thu Nov 10 12:42:58 PST 2005
On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 07:03:51AM +1100, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> One week is very little time to get public comment from other
> interested parties.
Agreed, though things are becoming more sane quickly. :)
> I also haven't figured out whether this header is included in every ogg
> packet or just the stream. From what I know of the Ogg container format
> the stream cannot be decoded if the file header is lost. Therefore adding
> header data to each packet is just redundant.
It should be included just at the head of the stream, it's redundant to
put it on every packet and I don't see any advantage to that.
> There is also no discussion on the wiki on how data is packed into an
> ogg packet. A sensible constrain would be that an ogg packet cannot
> be constructed with a partial frame (ie the samples for all channels
> for a single sampling period).
Agreed. I think this is a sufficient contraint, though perhaps
"applications SHOULD use a fixed block/packet size for predictable
buffering." and discuss the tradeoffs of packet and page sizes between
latency and overhead.
-r
More information about the ogg-dev
mailing list