[Icecast] Looking for a better way

Karl Heyes karl at xiph.org
Fri Jan 21 08:30:08 PST 2005

On Fri, 2005-01-21 at 15:39, Joe Mays wrote:

> This works, except for one thing. I have to test with it some more, but it seems like
> if something causes the sending client to disconnect, so that the initial machine
> loses the mountpoint, it will then pick the mountpoint up from the other machine when
> it scans it. Then when the sending client reconnects, it gets refused saying the
> mountpoint is already in use. The two cluster machines then hand the mountpoint back
> and forth to each other.

hmm, this is because the slave is reserving the mountpoint expecting it
to come back up, then the master sees the .  I think it would be
reasonable to not list inactive relays during master-slave updates

try this diff against 2.2, and let me know if that works better


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: streamlist.diff
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 437 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/icecast/attachments/20050121/30282883/streamlist.bin

More information about the Icecast mailing list