[icecast] Does developpers confirm it ?
karl at xiph.org
Wed Dec 17 15:52:59 UTC 2003
On Wed, 2003-12-17 at 14:17, Rakotomandimby Mihamina wrote:
> > <encode>
> > <samplerate>22000</samplerate>
> > <channels>1</channels>
> > <quality>0</quality>
> > <managed>1</managed>
> > <nominal-bitrate>35000</nominal-bitrate>
> > <minimum-bitrate>30000</minimum-bitrate>
> > <maximum-bitrate>40000</maximum-bitrate>
> > </encode>
> I don't know whether that syntax is valid anymore, I suspect it isn't. I
> suggest the following in your <instance></instance> section:
minor point, the samplerate is usually 22050
quality and nominal-bitrate are mutually exclusive, but the nominal
bitrate would be taken and currently implies managed mode as well.
At the moment it's better to use the quality tags.
<p>--- >8 ----
List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/
icecast project homepage: http://www.icecast.org/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'icecast-request at xiph.org'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed.
Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.
More information about the Icecast