AW: [icecast] final question: how many mountpoints can icecast handle ?
andrew at baselbiet.ch
Wed Nov 7 02:24:22 PST 2001
thanks a lot for the inside information about the mountpoints.
So what you're saying is that I need for my project when
doing with icecast 1.x
- per 25-50 concurrent users one single server
So problem is, if I wanted to handle, say 1000 streams,
I would need 200 Servers..this puts the concept a bit
in jeopardy because that would push the cost of the service
into astronomical..in comparison to handling, as I had planned
until now, 500 individual streams per server.
So I guess I'll have to wait until Icecast 2 for doing
a real prototype of this.
Just so that I get this right - if I have 1000 different on-demand
streams (its on-demand radio from huge mp3-library for users)
mountpoints are definitly the way to go, yes ? Or am I on the woodpath ?
Thanks a lot
> -----Ursprungliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Jack Moffitt [mailto:jack at xiph.org]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 7. November 2001 00:08
> An: Andreas Gunzenhauser
> Cc: icecast at xiph.org
> Betreff: Re: [icecast] final question: how many mountpoints
> can icecast
> handle ?
> > What happens when I use instead of ONE stream
> > different streams, because my concept is an on-demand
> > radio station that basically provides everyone with
> > access to a huge library of music files and lets him
> > create an own playlist that will be played only for him..
> > so if there is 1000 concurrent users, can there be 1000
> > different mount points - and will it still work ?
> Theoretically you can use as many mountpoints as you want.
> Unfortunately, some of the locking in icecast 1.x isn't very
> well done,
> and this causes problems in specifically this instance (of
> large numbers
> of mountpoints).
> Practical testing of icecast under these conditions revealed
> that 25-50
> mount points is reasonable, but much more starts to get
> dicey. > 100 is
> almost totally usuable.
> This won't be as big of an issue in icecast2 since the
> locking was more
> well thought out this time through. I hope to make the mountpoints a
> nonissue, as the number of clients currently are.
> 25-50 should be enough for even hardcore use, and if you
> need more (as
> we did. we were doing 450+ streams), it's easy enough to split them
> over multiple icecast servers with each server handling 25-50 streams.
--- >8 ----
List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/
icecast project homepage: http://www.icecast.org/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'icecast-request at xiph.org'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed.
Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.
More information about the Icecast