[icecast] different play lists on different ports?
lists at lastonepicked.com
Fri Jun 1 09:34:39 PDT 2001
Is it better to run multiple icecasts on different ports or several mount
points under one icecast from a performance standpoint?
> From: Jack Moffitt <jack at icecast.org>
> Reply-To: icecast at xiph.org
> Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 10:30:06 -0600
> To: icecast at xiph.org
> Subject: Re: [icecast] different play lists on different ports?
> For example:
> icecast isntance one, running on ports 8000, 8001, 8002
> icecast instance two, running on ports 9000, 9001, 9002
> 8000,8001,8002 will all act identically with no difference.
> 9000,9001,9002 will all act identically with no difference
> 8000,1,2 and 9000,1,2 will not be anything alike. They will not share
> sources or anything else, unless you've explicitly done this. (eg,
> sending the same stream to both servers).
> Running two icecast's on one box is functionally the same as two
> icecasts on two different boxes.
> Hopefully this clears things up a bit.
--- >8 ----
List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/
icecast project homepage: http://www.icecast.org/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'icecast-request at xiph.org'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed.
Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.
More information about the Icecast