colly at undernetlinux.com
Thu Aug 23 01:44:31 UTC 2001
Normally i would not run a devel package , but in this case with ices, yes,
they solved alot of
compatability issues , etc. when using ices 0.0.1 i was getting segmentation
faults, or stream errors and it would die after 2 hours, with ices 0.2.2 , i
have yet to see a error , OS : i am running Slackware/2.2.19 , been running
my stream now for over 30 days , problem free,
----- Original Message -----
From: Hunter Hillegas <lists at lastonepicked.com>
To: <icecast at xiph.org>
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 3:40 PM
Subject: [icecast] Ices
> I notice two versions on the Web site, 0.2.2 being shown as developmental.
> I'm building a new server that will run Icecast 1.3.11 and I'm wondering
> stable Ices 0.2.2 is? Are there enough fixes in it that it's worth using
> --- >8 ----
> List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/
> icecast project homepage: http://www.icecast.org/
> To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to
'icecast-request at xiph.org'
> containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed.
> Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.
--- >8 ----
List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/
icecast project homepage: http://www.icecast.org/
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'icecast-request at xiph.org'
containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed.
Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.
More information about the Icecast