thomas.ruecker at tieto.com
Sat May 11 23:51:31 PDT 2013
On 11 May 2013 15:32, Stephen Mahood <mv at cyberunions.org> wrote:
> Thank you for your interest in this, you description is as accurate as I
> can see.
>> From my perspective your challenges will be to get the containers right.
>> WebM for audio+video
>> Ogg for audio
>> Also (I'm not that familiar with webRTC) you might need to reencode
>> to Opus and VP8 in some cases?
> here is the great news [...]
> both Opus and VP8 are codecs are already supported in webrtc :)
Yes, I'm aware of that, but I don't understand webRTC well enough to
know if you can get away with a participant that only advertizes
support for the above and doesn't support:
and whatever else might still appear.
That is nothing to worry about for a first proof of concept though.
Start out with VP8 and Opus, worry about the rest later.
Yes, as I said, I'd concentrate on getting an ogg and webm muxer
emscripten and libogg for the start? Something proper would be
> I think there are amazing things that can be achieved with the webrtc
> connection to icecast. It seems could be similar to google hangout
> without the google dependency
Yes, the possibilities are vast. Now go and make it something awesome!
More information about the Icecast-dev