[foms] Proposing sessions for FOMS

[Silvia Pfeiffer]

On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 8:04 AM, Victor Carbune <victor.carbune at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 10:01 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer
> <silviapfeiffer1 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 7:19 PM, Philip Jägenstedt <philipj at opera.com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 8:27 AM, Silvia Pfeiffer
>>> <silviapfeiffer1 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>
>>>> FOMS is now only a bit over 2 weeks away!
>>>>
>>>> I. Session Proposals
>>>>
>>>> At this stage I'd like to encourage you to step forward and propose
>>>> topics for discussion. Be prepared to also be the moderator of a
>>>> session.
>>>>
>>>> We're doing this to get a good idea of the topics that we will need to
>>>> schedule. It also allows people to suggest topics about which they
>>>> would like to share some information. In general, we prefer sessions
>>>> not to have slides, but to gather discussion points at the beginning
>>>> of the session from everyone present and then go through these points.
>>>>
>>>> If, however, you would like to give a presentation on a topic that is
>>>> of general interest, do not hesitate to propose this, too. We can
>>>> accommodate different types of sessions.
>>>
>>> I'm interested in the WebVTT evolution session, and can take on some
>>> responsibility is required.
>>
>> Thanks. I expect there will be a follow-up session on WebVTT /
>> captioning after the evolution session, considering there is so much
>> to discuss. Would be great to share the effort. We'll also need
>> somebody to take notes, so maybe we can alternate.
>
> I personally think there's a need for at least two different ones: one
> focused on the spec itself (could be this one) and one focused
> exclusively on engines implementing it, their current state and future
> plans.

OK, I've added a second session with that focus and made Philip the
moderator. You can co-moderate if you like.

Cheers,
Silvia.