[Flac] playback problems with oppo BDP-95
Brian Willoughby
brianw at sounds.wa.com
Sat Feb 5 15:15:45 PST 2011
My friend somehow managed to get a BDP-95, even though the hardware
isn't scheduled to ship until March. The problem is that the manual
makes no mention of FLAC, at all, and only the web page claims to
support the format.
Playback of flac seems to work, but files from one online vendor work
flawlessly while files from other online vendors have strange
glitches that sound like a chirp or some kind of cheesy sci-fi movie
laser effect. My hunch is that the flac files with problems were
possibly compressed with --best or -8 and are just too much for the
BDP-95 to keep up with. Considering that the oppo BDP-95 supports
192 kHz playback and surround, I would expect them to use a fast
processor that can keep up with the demands of flac decoding.
Perhaps these problems will be fixed in the future with a firmware
upgrade - at least I hope it's not a situation where the processor is
simply underpowered and no amount of firmware rewriting will work.
I tried to browse around the main flac site looking for information
about hardware decoders, but I could not find any details. Has
anyone documented the levels of support for various pieces of
hardware? Actually, I see that the Squeezebox and Transporter are
specifically documented as supporting flac compression levels 0
through 8, which is great. Is there similar documentation of other
hardware platforms? I guess the BDP-95 is too new to be on any such
list anyway, but I was hoping to see more than three devices with
these details.
If anyone has suggestions, please let me know. I tried a couple of
Google searches, as well as Bing, but that was probably redundant.
Maybe I didn't use the right key words.
I'm suggesting that my friend uncompress to WAV and then recompress
with flac --fast, but I'm wondering if there is an easy way to know
that I higher level of compression would be guaranteed to work, even
for 'slow' hardware decoders.
Brian Willoughby
Sound Consulting
More information about the Flac
mailing list