[Flac] Encoding Options
Chris
cl at enposte.net
Tue Feb 1 10:09:27 PST 2005
for the "best" compression:
--super-secret-totally-impractical-compression-level
takes forever on my system (athlon 2500+) and sometimes results in
larger files. so i just stick with -8 -V --lax --no-padding.
-V to ensure the encode was vail
--no-padding to save a few more bytes, as "The encoder writes a PADDING
block of 4096 bytes by default." though 4kb over 3000 tracks is ~11 megs
i'm guessing --best is what it is because if -l was any higher or the
settings tuned for higher compression it would become like the above
option, totally impractical.
if you dont' want to stream just use --lax (someone correct me if i'm wrong)
I never use seektables because winamp seeks just fine. So as long as the
applications your going to use flac in can handle flac files without a
seek table dont' include it as its a few more bytes:)
chris
Oskar L. wrote:
> I have read FLAC's "--help", the man-page, and the HTML documentaion, but
> there are a few things that I don't understand.
>
> 1. I'll start with the thing I'm most confused about. The --best option is
> synonymous with -l 12 -b 4608 -m -e -r 6. Why is that? Is not -l 32 better
> that l- 12? And you can have -r 0,8 without using --lax, and -r 0,16 with
> --lax.
>
> 2. The --lax option allows the encoder to generate "non-Subset files", but
> just what is a non-Subset file? The HTML documentation says that these
> files may not be streamable, but if I don't need streamable files, is
> there any reason not to use --lax?
>
> 3. I made a FLAC file without a seektable, and I could seek in it using
> XMMS in GNU/Linux and in Winamp in Windows. Are there any applications
> that require a seektable for seeking to work?
>
> 4. What does the -p option do? The HTML documentation only says
> "Exhaustively search LP coeff quantization", and that it's expensive and
> overrides any -q option. Just what is "LP coeff quantization"? I tried
> using this option on several files, but it resulted in larer files that
> without it, why is that? The documentation says that it "typically will
> only improve the compression a tiny fraction of a percent", not make
> larger files.
>
> Oskar
> _______________________________________________
> Flac mailing list
> Flac at xiph.org
> http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac
>
>
> .
>
More information about the Flac
mailing list