[Flac] Standard encoding rates?

[Ralph Giles]

On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 10:44:41AM -0500, Hal Vaughan wrote:

> The numbers are helpful, but I was trying to use those terms as examples.  I 
> guess I mean, are there encoding rates that are more or less standard?  For 
> example, if an expert is recording at a lower quality, are they likely to set 
> it at, say, 10000 samples per second, or more likely to use 8000 samples per 
> second?  Or are there no standard rates and most files are just encrypted at 
> whatever rate the person creating them felt was a good balance of quality vs. 
> file size?

If you just want digital sampling conventions, there are generally two. 
One based on subdivisions or multiples of the CD rate of 44100 Hz and 
one on powers of two.

So, as mentioned, 44.1, 48, 96 kHz are common for music. On the low end, 
32, 16, 8, and 11.025, 22.050, and sometimes 24 are common. Those two 
sets give you something close to most targets. A lot of it depends on 
your target hardware capabilities.

HTH,
 -r