[flac-dev] Re-release of version 1.3.2?

[Erik de Castro Lopo]

Patrick McCarty wrote:

> Since this appears to have been a re-release of version 1.3.2, was this
> an intentional re-release?

Yes it was. The bad tarball was on on the main upload site for
a couple of hours but problems with the mirroring meant that
the bad tarball lingered on some of the mirrors for much longer.

The reason the bad tarball was bad the bad date in one of the
test files.shown in the diff below.

Erik


diff -Nru flac-1.3.2-v1/test/metaflac-test-files/case07-expect.meta flac-1.3.2-v2/test/metaflac-test-files/case07-expect.meta
--- flac-1.3.2-v1/test/metaflac-test-files/case07-expect.meta	2016-12-31 16:52:09.366371726 -0800
+++ flac-1.3.2-v2/test/metaflac-test-files/case07-expect.meta	2016-12-31 19:54:28.827304796 -0800
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-reference libFLAC 1.3.1 20141125
+reference libFLAC 1.3.2 20170101
 ARTIST=The_artist_formerly_known_as_the_artist...
 ARTIST=Chuck_Woolery
 ARTIST=Vern



-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Erik de Castro Lopo
http://www.mega-nerd.com/