[flac-dev] Re-release of version 1.3.2?

Erik de Castro Lopo mle+la at mega-nerd.com
Tue Feb 7 07:20:36 UTC 2017

Patrick McCarty wrote:

> Since this appears to have been a re-release of version 1.3.2, was this
> an intentional re-release?

Yes it was. The bad tarball was on on the main upload site for
a couple of hours but problems with the mirroring meant that
the bad tarball lingered on some of the mirrors for much longer.

The reason the bad tarball was bad the bad date in one of the
test files.shown in the diff below.


diff -Nru flac-1.3.2-v1/test/metaflac-test-files/case07-expect.meta flac-1.3.2-v2/test/metaflac-test-files/case07-expect.meta
--- flac-1.3.2-v1/test/metaflac-test-files/case07-expect.meta	2016-12-31 16:52:09.366371726 -0800
+++ flac-1.3.2-v2/test/metaflac-test-files/case07-expect.meta	2016-12-31 19:54:28.827304796 -0800
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-reference libFLAC 1.3.1 20141125
+reference libFLAC 1.3.2 20170101

Erik de Castro Lopo

More information about the flac-dev mailing list