[flac-dev] Performance tests

[Martijn van Beurden]

Op 3-2-2016 om 19:52 schreef MauritsVB:
> Hi Martijn,
>
> I don’t know if it’s just my Firefox or whether something breaks during the parsing of the email but none of your links seem to work for me. I feel it might have something to do with the spaces in the file names of the PDFs, which doesn’t translate well to URLs.
>
> Thanks,
> Lennard

Turns out that even in 2016, things like sending a link in an e-mail 
still isn't as easy as it should be. I will be less stubborn next time. :)

So, here are the links, again. First, the 'regular' comparisons
www.audiograaf.nl/misc_stuff/Comparison_on_64-bit_Linux_2008_Intel.pdf
www.audiograaf.nl/misc_stuff/Comparison_on_64-bit_Windows_2014_Intel_AVX2.pdf
www.audiograaf.nl/misc_stuff/Comparison_on_32-bit_ARM_Raspberry_Pi_B.pdf

The CPUs are an Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 and an Intel Core i7-4910MQ. 
Secondly, these three systems were tested with flac binaries compiled 
with --enable-64-bit-word

www.audiograaf.nl/misc_stuff/Comparison_64-bit_word_on_64-bit_Linux_2008_Intel.pdf
www.audiograaf.nl/misc_stuff/Comparison_64-bit_word_on_64-bit_Windows_2014_Intel.pdf
www.audiograaf.nl/misc_stuff/Comparison_64_bit_words_32-bit_ARM_Raspberry_Pi.pdf

Finally, I compared the 64-bit word option with FLAC run with, and 
without MD5 sum calculation to verify that the 64-bit word length 
speedup is not mainly because of MD5 sum calculation
www.audiograaf.nl/misc_stuff/Comparison_64-bit_word_on_64-bit_Windows_2014_Intel_No_MD5_sum.pdf

Hope this works better :)