[flac-dev] [PATCH] Remove even more CPP hackery

[Ben Allison]

>> Dave Yeo wrote:
>>> Yes that makes sense. Requiring a C99 compliant compiler seems quite
> reasonable.
>> Well I'm actually going to be even more reasonable than that. The only
> bits of C99 that flac will really require is header file
>> with C99 standard width integers (int8_t, uint8_t, int16_t etc). Erik
>
> I would recommend including with the distribution a file for windows
> developers to use.  It's fairly simple
>
>
> 	/* since windows doesn't have stdint.h */
> 	typedef unsigned __int64 uint64_t;
> 	typedef unsigned __int32 uint32_t;
> 	typedef unsigned __int16 uint16_t;
> 	typedef unsigned __int8 uint8_t;
> 	typedef __int64 int64_t;
> 	typedef __int32 int32_t;
> 	typedef __int16 int16_t;
> 	typedef __int8  int8_t;
> #if defined(_M_IX64)
> 	typedef unsigned __int128 uint128_t;
> 	typedef __int128 int128_t;
> #endif

Also, I agree with the consensus that developers have to #include such a
file before using including FLAC/all.h
This is because many Windows developers (such as myself) are likely to
already have a stdint.h replacement defined somewhere in their project. 
The other choice would be to see if there's some preprocessor symbol
commonly in use that would indicate that these are defined by the compiler
or by preprocessor directives.