[Flac-dev] Re: FLAC: same features as WavPack

[Josh Green]

On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 12:53 -0700, Brian Willoughby wrote:
>  > Hello FLAC list.
>  >
>  > As far as I know 24 bit FLAC support is broken.  It often doesn't
>  > compress the audio at all, but instead stores the chunks as verbatim
>  > type (although the FLAC format supports 24 bit).  Perhaps this is  
> fixed?
>  > If so, do let me know.
> 
> Hi Josh Green,
> 
> 24-bit FLAC works perfectly, and has done so for years.  I regularly  
> make live recordings in 24-bit and back them up after compressing  
> with FLAC.  I sometimes files as small as 30% of the original because  
> I record at conservative levels to avoid.  Also, if you screw up and  
> put 16-bit audio samples in a 24-bit file, FLAC will still compress  
> this to within 1% or 2% of what you get when compressing the 16-bit  
> file.  FLAC 1.1.2 is what I have tested the most, and I'm not sure  
> how long I've been running 1.1.4 so far.
> 

Hmm, well I'm not trying to start any rumors.  Here is the beginning of
the thread in which this was discussed.  Admittedly I have not tested
the latest in this regard.  Will do so at some point soon.

http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/2006-August/001935.html

And the resulting response from Josh Coalson:

http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/2006-August/001937.html

>  > I believe 32 bit floats have a precision of 23 bits
>  > when the audio is +/- 1.0, so in theory that would mean that 24 bit
>  > would have more precision but less dynamic range (if the floating  
> point
>  > range is outside of +/- 1.0).
> 
> No.  Floating point values are always normalized so that the most  
> significant "1" bit is always in the same position.  Thus this bit is  
> not stored.  So the 23 bits that are stored , plus the 1 bit that is  
> assumed, both add up to 24 bits total.  32-bit float has the same  
> precision as 24-bit integer.
> 

Ok.  I was aware of the "1" being implicit, but I suppose I wasn't
taking that into account.  I imagine if FLAC was designed for floating
point audio it might do better than converting it to 24 bit audio though
before hand, since floating point isn't a linear range and perhaps the
waveform predictors wouldn't be ideal (just speculating here!).  But if
this conversion makes sense, why not have support for it built into
FLAC?  You'd get 24 bit out, which wouldn't exactly be preserving the
format, but it would at least make it possible.  At a minimum its a nice
"buzz" word (weeee 32 bit float support!).  Perhaps that isn't really
the scope of FLAC though.

>  > The conversion to 24 bit would be a
>  > problem in that case.
> 
> Well, yes, clipping is a problem whether you're playing the audio so  
> you can listen to it, or you're converting to integer for any other  
> reason.  That's why 32-bit is important for intermediate stages of  
> modern DAW software.
> 

Floating point sound card anyone?  I suppose not, point taken.

> Brian Willoughby
> Sound Consulting
> 

Best regards,
	Josh Green