[Flac-dev] liboggflac1 soname

[Josh Coalson]

--- Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh at debian.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jan 2005, Ralph Giles wrote:
> > As such it's an incompatible change, for which you should also
> > zero the 'age' field. So 1.1.1-beta1 should have been 2:0:0,
> > not 2:0:1.
> [...]
> > Yes, I agree. The numbering is all about coexisting installs of the
> 
> > various versions.
> 
> Ok.  I need to know what to do about this... is 1.1.2 with fixed
> sonames
> just around the corner?  What should we do to fix sonames in Debian?

OK, I am going to do a 1.1.2 earlier than I wanted in order to
fix this.  anyway there are some bug fixes and speedups that will
be of benefit.

because of the mess and since there have been API changes and
additions in both libFLAC and libOggFLAC since 1.1.1 I plan on
bumping all the libtool numbers as follows: current++, revision=0
age=0.  if this will cause problems please let me know.

I'll try to get this ready as soon as possible.

Josh



		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
All your favorites on one personal page – Try My Yahoo!
http://my.yahoo.com