[Flac-dev] possible format change
Josh Coalson
xflac at yahoo.com
Mon Mar 26 11:15:47 PST 2001
> > i think you should change format 'cause everyone was warned about
> > possible format change and noone uses flac for archiving now.
> > while it's beta we should just test and improve format.
> > it'll be harder to do later and tail of compability patches
> > can make format too complicated.
> > ~~~~~~
> > andrei
>
> I also think you should change the format now, and I *do* use FLAC
> for archiving. When I write FLAC files to tape, I also write the
> FLAC program(s) I used for the archive. Before removing the
> original,
> I verify that uncompressing the FLAC file gives me back the original.
>
> It's much better to change the format now than after 1.0. FLAC files
> from 0.4, 0.5, and 0.6 can't be uncompressed with the same program,
> so
> there's no reason to expect 0.8 and 0.9 or 0.9 and 1.0 to be
> compatible.
> However, all 1.x versions should have a compatible format.
>
> Now is the time.
>
Good, it looks like everyone's in agreement. I'll go ahead and make
the changes before 0.9 so we'll all have some more time to test.
Josh
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
More information about the Flac-dev
mailing list