[Flac-dev] Re: beta 10 candidate checked in

[Josh Coalson]

> > > >     .SUFFIXES: .lo .s
> > > >     .s.lo:
> > > 
> > > (This of course doesn't work with automake.)
> > 
> > It doesn't?  Anything in a Makefile.am that doesn't appear to be
> special
> > automake magic is passed through to the Makefile (via Makefile.in).
> 
> Yes, but... Hey, you're right.
> 
> I thought I had seen automake insert its own .s.lo rule anyway,
> with both rules ending up in the result, but apparently I've been
> mistaken.  Sorry for the confusion. :-(
> 
> Indeed, this works:
> 
> -%.lo: %.s
> +SUFFIXES = .s .lo
> +.s.lo:
>  
cool, I made the patch.  now that we've discovered SUFFIXES I will
probably toy with using .nasm instead of .s again because I kind of
like being able to tell which assembler the code is meant for by the
filename.  I can see cases where people might mix and match in the
future.

Josh


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 
a year!  http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/