[Flac-dev] 1.0 candidate checked in

[Matt Zimmerman]

On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 08:09:04AM -0700, collver at linuxfreemail.com wrote:

> I was looking at the flac tarball, not CVS.  Sorry for the misinformation.
> 
> bash-2.05$ libtool --version
> ltmain.sh (GNU libtool) 1.4a (1.641.2.255 2001/05/22 10:39:30)
> 
> this is the libtool installed by NetBSD pkgsrc.
> 
> I verified that there is no "--tag" option in GNU libtool 1.4, but there is
> in the source tarball of the libtool on my system.  The interesting stuff
> is in this patch:  ftp://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/libtool/libtool-1.4-1.4b.diff.gz

This is a pre-release version of libtool, then.  It is important to know that
these changes are coming, but we should be careful not to break things for
people who are using the current stable release.  The FLAC tarball should ship
with libtool 1.4 (vanilla).

> > > Maybe it would be a good idea to either (1) undo the patch I sent or
> > > (2) generate flac's libtool script using libtool 1.4.
> > > 
> > > Both versions recognize .asm but not .nasm.  I recommend renaming the
> > > .nasm files to .asm files.
> > 
> > The standard extension for assembler files seems to be .s or .S.  I don't
> > remember what the problem was with using those.
> 
> When I use Makefile.am from flac 0.10, the libtool uses the GNU assembler
> to attempt to assemble the .s files.

Yes, by default, but it should be possible to add a rule to override this
(as you did in another message).

-- 
 - mdz