[xiph-rtp] [vorbis-rtp] Updates

[Michael Smith]

On 10/19/05, Ralph Giles <giles at xiph.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2005 at 01:14:54PM +0200, Luca Barbato wrote:
>
> > rfc: I recently removed the caching paragraph since doesn't apply
> > anymore. I'd like to have you have a review, tell me if that would work
> > for your purposes and notify me about any errors. I'd like to have this
> > draft committed to the rfc editor soon (say tomorrow or the day after).
>
> Here's my review. I also checked in some minor wording changes. I think
> we can still make a lot of the text more clear, but let's get the
> details worked out first. :)
>
> The spec doesn't give a payload type. Do we assign that, or do we need
> the WG to do that? I note we've been using 96 in the reference
> implementations and 98 in the SDP examples.

Static payload types are no longer assigned (by explicit policy),
these days it's done only by dynamic payload mappings through SDP.
Static mappings are only used for the pre-existing ones.

Mike