[xiph-rtp] Updated Speex I-D

[Phil Kerr]

Hi Jean-Marc,

Jean-Marc.Valin at USherbrooke.ca wrote:

>Hi Phil,
>
>The speex rtp draft is about to expire and we should re-sumbit it. I
>looked at http://www.plus24.com/xiph/draft-ietf-avt-rtp-speex-00.txt and
>I see a few things that should be changed:
>
>- Section 7, 2nd paragraph: "Speex codecs [7] are able to detect the the
>bitrate from the payload" should remove one "the".
>  
>
Fixed.

>- My email is listed (twice) as jean-marc.valin at hermes.usherb.ca. Could
>you change it to jean-marc.valin at usherbrooke.ca (the hermes is no longer
>valid)
>  
>
Fixed in both places.

>- Please are reference to the "penh" parameter. It's doesn't belong to
>the RTP draft.
>  
>
Removed references (commented out in XML).

One other thing I noticed, the first example in Section 9. (SDP) has the 
mode set to 4 yet the comment references mode=3.  Fixed with mode=4 in 
both places.

Also, the ITU page doesn't seem to be on the Speex website yet.  This 
will need to be fixed before submission.

>Otherwise, I think we're ready for WG.
>  
>
Ok. 

**** This is *Last Call* for this revision ****


http://www.plus24.com/xiph/draft-ietf-avt-rtp-speex-00.xml
http://www.plus24.com/xiph/draft-ietf-avt-rtp-speex-00.txt

If no calls are made it will be submitted to the IETF on Wednesday 12th 
October, 20:00 GMT.

The next IETF meeting has been announced, in Vancouver, with a 
provisional AVT slot allocated for 11th November.  The WG Chairs have 
put a call out for time slot requests and if we want we should let them 
know by 24th October.  Jean-Marc, would you be able to make this?

Regards

Phil


>Cheers,
>
>	Jean-Marc
>
>Le samedi 27 août 2005 à 23:07 +0100, Phil Kerr a écrit :
>  
>
>>Dear all,
>>
>>An updated Speex I-D is available.
>>
>>http://www.plus24.com/xiph/draft-ietf-avt-rtp-speex-00.xml
>>http://www.plus24.com/xiph/draft-ietf-avt-rtp-speex-00.txt
>>
>>As directed by the AVT Chairs this version should be submitted as a WG 
>>document to the IETF.
>>
>>Changes over the last version are based on feedback on the AVT list, 
>>2005-04-12, with the biggest change the removal of the ITU specific 
>>sections as the IETF feel this is not suitable for inclusion in an I-D.  
>>Colin Perkins suggested this section be hosted on the Speex website and 
>>a copy, which can be reformatted to suit, can be found here:
>>
>>http://www.plus24.com/xiph/speex_itu.html
>>
>>Regards
>>
>>Phil
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>xiph-rtp mailing list
>>xiph-rtp at xiph.org
>>http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/xiph-rtp
>>
>>    
>>