[xiph-rtp] Section 6, Congestion (Re: xiph-rtp Digest, Vol 3, Issue 9)

[Phil Kerr]

[caught out by the reply-to]

Phil Kerr wrote:

> Hmmm, tough call.
>
> Do we go with an implementation which highlights a feature that isn't 
> fully mature, and dashes peoples expectations of it.  Or do we skip 
> implementing this feature and leave the I-D text stating that this 
> feature is not implemented at this time.
>
> -P
>
>
> Ramón García wrote:
>
>> Perhaps I am wrong and bitpeeling is not a trivial operation, and it
>> would need to add more information to the Vorbis frames.
>>
>> Searching in google site:lists.xiph.org bitpeeling gave
>>
>> http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/vorbis/2003-April/thread.html#10339
>>
>> However, one can experiment with bitpeeling provided that one puts up
>> with the horrible quality. If all you want is to have your software
>> ready for bitpeeling, that should be enough.
>>
>> Ramon
>>
>>  
>>
>
>