[xiph-rtp] Alternate Implementations
Ross Finlayson
finlayson at live.com
Fri Dec 17 14:32:51 PST 2004
>However, I just thought I'd say that we're very interested in helping
>this move forward* and should be able to provide another, alternate
>implementation - in the hopes of helping standardisation efforts.
>(Multiple implementations being a normal IETF requirement for
>standardisation)
Just to be clear: Multiple implementations are required only for the
*second* stage in the IETF standardization process: Draft Standard. The
first stage in the standardization process - Proposed Standard - does not
require multiple implementations (but will, of course, require the
consensus of the IETF AVT working group, and the IESG).
In any case, I also plan to include implementations of the Vorbis (and
Speex) RTP payload formats in the "LIVE.COM Streaming Media" libraries -
once these payload format specifications have undergone additional IETF
review, and appear stable. So that will be another independent
implementation of these payload formats.
Ross Finlayson
LIVE.COM
<http://www.live.com/>
More information about the xiph-rtp
mailing list