[xiph-rtp] RTP development status update

[Phil Kerr]

Are there any changes needed or can it just be re-submitted?

-P


Jean-Marc Valin wrote:

>In the mean time, the Speex RTP I-D isn't going anywhere. Anyone's got
>time to work on that a bit ATM? Or at-least re-submit the expired draft?
>
>	Jean-Marc
>
>Le mardi 07 décembre 2004 à 13:50 +0000, Phil Kerr a écrit :
>  
>
>>Hi all,
>>
>>A quick status update on RTP developments.
>>
>>I should have ready this week an updated Vorbis RTP I-D together with an 
>>alpha of the reference server. This should give us a good basis for 
>>seeing what shape the draft is in from a technical perspective and all 
>>being well focus can be given on ironing out the nits so the I-D can be 
>>submitted to the AVT by the end of the month. 
>>
>>Next month focus will be given to developing the Theora RTP I-D and 
>>reference applications and February will focus on refining both the 
>>I-D's and applications so the drafts can be submitted for WG status.
>>
>>I'd like to invite others on the list to implement applications derived 
>>from the I-D's as having more than one set of implementations will help 
>>with making progress with the IETF as well as having a range of 
>>applications others can chose from (different languages, different 
>>features and so on).
>>
>>Best regards
>>
>>Phil
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>xiph-rtp mailing list
>>xiph-rtp at xiph.org
>>http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/xiph-rtp
>>
>>    
>>